4.7 Article

Effects of specimen and grain size on electrically -induced softening behavior in uniaxial micro-tension of AZ31 magnesium alloy: Experiment and modeling

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 134-143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.064

关键词

Electrically-assisted; Softening behavior; Size effect; Micro-tension; Magnesium alloy; Modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475124, 51635005]
  2. National Science Foundation of the United States [CMMI-1100787, DMR-1121262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various electrically-assisted (EA) plastic forming technologies have been developed for difficult-to-form materials such as magnesium alloys in recent years. However, very few studies have been conducted on EA micro-forming, especially determining the size effect on electrically-induced softening behavior. In this study, uniaxial micro-tension tests at various current densities were conducted to investigate the effects of grain size and specimen size on the electrically-induced softening behavior of magnesium alloy AZ31 specimens. It was found that the electrically-induced softening, parameter (i.e., the ratio of the tensile strength in EA to that in non EA test with the higher softening at the smaller value) followed an inverse-S-shaped function of current density. A relatively lower current density would be sufficient for larger sample sizes and smaller grain sizes to achieve a higher softening effect, indicating that grain number may be an important factor influencing electrically-induced softening. These size effects on electrically-induced softening were used to modify a semi-empirical softening function of current density, which could effectively predict the electrically-induced softening behaviors of five metals. The current density threshold in EA tension was defined and formulated based on the semi-empirical softening function, which nonlinearly increased with grain size, but decreased with specimen size and electrical resistivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据