4.7 Article

Femtosecond laser fabricated micro/nano interface structures toward enhanced bonding strength and heat transfer capability of W/Cu joining

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 185-193

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.094

关键词

Fs laser fabrication; W/Cu joining; Micro/nano interface structures; Bonding strength; Heat transfer capability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51210009, 51575309]
  2. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2011CB013000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

W/Cu joining is key for the fabrication of plasma facing components for fusion reactors, which however is very challenging due to the immiscible nature of Cu-W binary system and the mismatch of thermal expansion coefficient between W and Cu. In this research, we proposed a method for comprehensive enhancement of the bonding strength and heat transfer capability of W/Cu joining based on femtosecond (fs) laser fabricated micro/nano interface structures. Four kinds of surface structures, namely pristine structure, nano ripples, micro-cubes array and micro-pits array were designed and fabricated on W by fs laser ablation, which were then introduced into W/Cu interfaces by hot pressing joining at 1000 degrees C, 80 MPa. The micro/nano interface structures lead to significant enhancement of W/Cu bonding strength, which reaches 101.58 MPa for W/Cu direct joining and 120.43 MPa for W/Cu joining with Cu interlayer, increased by about 150% and 190% compared with W/Cu joining with a flat interface. The thermal diffusivity and thermal stress resistance of W/Cu joining are also improved. The strengthening mechanism is recognized to be the combined effects of micro/nano interface structures related interdiffusion between W and Cu and increased resistance against W/Cu interfacial debonding. Our research provides a method for enhanced joining between W and Cu, as well as a vast range of dissimilar materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据