4.3 Article

IMPACT Observatory: tracking the evolution of clinical trial data sharing and research integrity

期刊

BIOCHEMIA MEDICA
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 308-317

出版社

CROATIAN SOC MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTS
DOI: 10.11613/BM.2016.035

关键词

clinical trial data sharing; research integrity; IMPACT Observatory

资金

  1. Committee for Publication Ethics (COPE)
  2. European Union [291823]
  3. NEWFELPRO project [35]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The opening of research data is emerging thanks to the increasing possibilities of digital technology. The opening of clinical trial (CT) data is a part of this process, expected to have positive scientific, ethical, health, and economic impacts thus contributing to research integrity. The January 2016 proposal by the International Council of Medical Journal Editors triggered ample discussion about CT data sharing and reconfirmed the need for an ongoing assessment of its dynamics. The IMProving Access to Clinical Trials data (IMPACT) Observatory aims to play such a role, and assess the data sharing culture, policies, and practices of key players, the impact of their interventions on CTs, and contribute to a transformation of research. The objective of this paper is to present the IMPACT Observatory as well as share some of its preliminary findings. Materials and methods: Methods include a scoping study of research, surveys, interviews, and an environmental scan of research data repositories. Results: Our preliminary findings indicate that although opening of CT data has not yet been achieved, its evolution is encouraging. Initiatives by key players contribute to increasing of CT data sharing, and many barriers are shrinking or disappearing. Conclusions: The major barrier is the lack of data sharing standards, from preparing data for public sharing to its curatorship, findability and access. However, experiences accumulated by sharing CT data according to upon request or open mechanisms could inform the development of such standards. The Vivli, CORBEL-ECRIN and Open Trials projects are currently working in this direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据