4.4 Article

Diagnostic Yield of Patch Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring in Children (from a National Registry)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 115, 期 5, 页码 630-634

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. iRhythm Technologies, San Francisco, California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diagnostic yield of continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring in children for periods longer than a Holter monitor is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize diagnostic yield, arrhythmia type, and time to first arrhythmia using a clinical repository of national ambulatory ECG data in children. A cross-sectional study was performed in 3,209 consecutive children receiving a 14-day adhesive patch monitor (Zio Patch) for clinical indications from January 2011 to December 2013. Of the 3,209 children (56% female, mean age 12.5 +/- 4.4 years, range 1 month to 17 years), 390 had arrhythmias detected, making the diagnostic yield 12.2%. Of these, 137 patients (4.3%) had arrhytlunias deemed clinically significant to warrant urgent physician notification. The most frequent indications for monitoring were palpitations (n = 1,138 [35.5%]), syncope (n = 450 [14.0%]), unspecified tachycardia (n = 291 [9.1%]), supraventricular tachycardia (n = 264 [8.2%]), and chest pain (n = 261 [8.1%]). Arrhythmias were detected in 10.0% of patients with palpitations, 6.7% of patients with syncope, 14.8% of patients with tachycardia, 22.7% of patients with supraventricular tachycardia, and 6.5% of patients with chest pain. The mean times to first detected and first symptom-triggered arrhythrnias were 2.7 +/- 3.0 and 3.3 +/- 3.3 days, respectively. Forty-four percent of first detected arrhythmias and 50.4% of the first symptom-triggered arrhytlunias occurred beyond 48 hours of monitoring. In conclusion, the diagnostic yield of continuous ECG patch monitoring in children was substantial beyond 48 hours and should be considered in children who are candidates for longer term ECG monitoring. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据