4.7 Article

Tunable Multiscale Nanoparticle Ordering by Polymer Crystallization

期刊

ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 751-758

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00157

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1408323, DMR-1508249]
  2. Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]
  4. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1408323] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While similar to 75% of commercially utilized polymers [GRAPHIC] are semicrystalline, the generally low mechanical modulus of these materials, especially for those possessing a glass transition temperature below room temperature, restricts their use for structural applications. Our focus in this paper is to address this deficiency through the controlled, multiscale assembly of nanoparticles (NPs), in particular by leveraging the kinetics of polymer crystallization. This process yields a multiscale NP structure that is templated by the lamellar semicrystalline polymer morphology and spans NPs engulfed by the growing crystals, NPs ordered into layers in the interlamellar zone [spacing of (10-100 nm)], and NPs assembled into fractal objects at the interfibrillar scale, (110 mu m). The relative fraction of NPs in this hierarchy is readily manipulated by the crystallization speed. Adding NPs usually increases the Young's modulus of the polymer, but the effects of multiscale ordering are nearly an order of magnitude larger than those for a state where the NPs are not ordered, i.e., randomly dispersed in the matrix. Since the material's fracture toughness remains practically unaffected in this process, this assembly strategy allows us to create high modulus materials that retain the attractive high toughness and low density of polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据