4.8 Article

Is energy utilization among Chinese provinces sustainable?

期刊

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 198-206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.003

关键词

Total-factor energy efficiency; New urbanization; Environment; Slack-based measure; Malmquist index

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71203153]
  2. Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China [16YJC630051]
  3. Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Foundation of Tianjin [TJGL16]
  4. Project of Science and Technology Development Strategy Research and Planning of Tianjin [2014ZIZIZF00002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the advent of China's reformation and open policy, its economy and levels of urbanization experienced explosive growth. However, the widely employed high input, high pollution style of resource consumption violates the green growth principle, and is imposing increasing pressure on both the energy infrastructure and the environment. Due to the complex relationships between resources, energy, urbanization, and the environment, it is imperative to explore methods that maximize total-factor energy efficiency and reduce environmental pollution, to achieve green growth. The slack-based measure (SBM) of efficiency was used to evaluate the total factor energy efficiencies of 29 Chinese provinces for specific periods. Further, we leveraged the Malmquist index to explore efficiency trends from 2005 to 2014. The results show that urbanization and energy efficiency are positively correlated, whereas decreasing ratings in some provinces indicate economic recession or severe environmental pollution. Almost two-thirds of the measured provinces are energy inefficient, but have shown slow but clear improvement, indicating the huge potential for growth. Based on the findings, Chinese provinces are allocated to three categories, and policy recommendations and implementation measures are discussed, for improving total-factor energy efficiency nationwide. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据