4.5 Article

The accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-navigated screw insertion in the upper and subaxial cervical spine

期刊

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 2967-2976

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3974-2

关键词

Navigated screw insertion; Cervical spine; Accuracy of screw insertion; Spine surgery; Complications in cervical spine surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to better primary stability and repositioning options, pedicle screws are increasingly used during posterior stabilization of the cervical spine. However, the serious risks generally associated with the insertion of screws in the cervical spine remain. The purpose of this study is to examine the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with the use of 3D fluoroscopy navigation systems, also accounting for various spine levels. Data of 64 patients were collected during and after screw implantation (axial and subaxial) in the cervical spine. 207 screws were implanted from C1 to C7 and analyzed for placement accuracy according to postoperative CT scans and following the modified Gertzbein and Robbins classification. The accuracy of most of the inserted screws was assessed as grade 2 according to the modified Gertzbein and Robbins classification. 93.9 % of the screws implanted at C1 or C2, and 78.51 % of the screws implanted at levels C3-C7 showed placement accuracy grade 2 or better, indicating pedicle wall perforation of < 2 mm. Overall, seven complications were observed. In three cases, the vertebral artery was affected, leading to one fatality. Surgical revision was necessary once because of Magerl screw misplacement and three times due to impaired wound healing. No radicular symptoms resulted from screw malposition. Axial and subaxial screws can be inserted with a high grade of accuracy using 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation systems. Nevertheless, while this useful innovation helps to minimize the risks of misplacement, the surgery is still a challenge, as arising complications remain severe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据