4.5 Article

A novel mathematical model and multi-objective method for the low-carbon flexible job shop scheduling problem

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.suscom.2016.11.002

关键词

Low-carbon scheduling; Flexible job shop scheduling; Multi-objective optimization; Energy efficiency; Noise emission

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51375004, 51435009]
  2. Youth Science & Technology Chenguang Program of Wuhan [2015070404010187]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. HUST [2015TS061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most conventional scheduling problems use production efficiency, cost and quality as their preeminent optimization objectives. However, because of increasing costs of energy and environmental pollution, lowcarbon scheduling as a novel scheduling model has received increasing attention from scholars and engineers. This scheduling model focuses on reducing energy consumption and environmental pollution at the workshop level. In this paper, a new low-carbon mathematical scheduling model is proposed for the flexible job-shop environment that optimizes productivity, energy efficiency and noise reduction. In this model, the machining spindle speed which affects production time, power and noise is flexible and is treated as an independent decision-making variable. The methods of evaluation of productivity, energy consumption and noise are presented. A multi-objective genetic algorithm based on a simplex lattice design is proposed to solve this mixed-integer programming model effectively. The corresponding encoding/decoding method, fitness function, and crossover/mutation operators are designed specifically for the features of this problem. Three example problem instances with different scales and one Engineering case study illustrate and evaluate the performance of this method. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and method for the low-carbon job shop scheduling problem.(C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据