4.6 Article

Cow, yak, and camel milk diets differentially modulated the systemic immunity and fecal microbiota of rats

期刊

SCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 62, 期 6, 页码 405-414

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2017.01.027

关键词

Gut microbiota; Milk; Yak; Cow; Camel; Prevotella copri

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31460389]
  2. Key Laboratory Major Open Project Fund of Inner Mongolia [20130902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cow milk is most widely consumed; however, non-cattle milk has gained increasing interest because of added nutritive values. We compared the health effects of yak, cow, and camel milk in rats. By measuring several plasma immune factors, significantly more interferon-gamma was detected in the camel than the yak (P = 0.0020) or cow (P = 0.0062) milk group. Significantly more IgM was detected in the yak milk than the control group (P = 0.0071). The control group had significantly less interleukin 6 than the yak (P = 0.0499) and cow (P = 0.0248) milk groups. The fecal microbiota of the 144 samples comprised mainly of the Firmicutes (76.70 +/- 11.03%), Bacteroidetes (15.27 +/- 7.79%), Proteobacteria (3.61 +/- 4.34%), and Tenericutes (2.61 +/- 2.53%) phyla. Multivariate analyses revealed a mild shift in the fecal microbiota along the milk treatment. We further identified the differential microbes across the four groups. At day 14, 22 and 28 differential genera and species were identified (P = 0.0000-0.0462), while 8 and 11 differential genera and species (P = 0.0000-0.0013) were found at day 28. Some short-chain fatty acid and succinate producers increased, while certain health-concerned bacteria (Prevotella copri, Phascolarctobacterium faecium, and Bacteroides uniformis) decreased after 14 days of yak or camel milk treatment. We demonstrated that different animal milk could confer distinctive nutritive value to the host. (C) 2017 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据