4.7 Article

Effect of MnO2 doped on physical, structure and optical properties of zinc silicate glasses from waste rice husk ash

期刊

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 955-961

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.02.020

关键词

Rice husk; Manganese dioxide; Glass; Zinc silicate; Sintering; Optical properties

资金

  1. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an investigation was conducted to explore and synthesize silicate (SiO2) glass from waste rice husk ash (RHA). MnO2 doped zinc silicate glasses with chemical formula [(ZnO)(55) + (WRHA)(45)](100-X)[MnO2](X), (where X = 0, 1, 3 and 5 wt%) was prepared by conventional melt quenching technique. The glass samples were characterized using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy. The results revealed that by increasing the concentration of MnO2, the color of glass samples changed from colorless to brown and the density of glass increased. XRD results showed that a broad halo peak which centered on the low angle (2 theta = 30 degrees) indicated the amorphous nature of the glass. FTIR results showed basic structural units of Si-O-Si in non-bridging oxygen, Si-O and Mn-O in the glass network. FESEM result showed a decreasing porosity with an increasing MnO2 content, which was attributed to the Mn ions resort to occupy interstitial sites inside the pores of glass. Besides, the absorption intensity of glass increased and the band gap value decreased with increasing the MnO2 percentage. In this synthesized glass system of MnO2 doped zinc silicate glasses using RHA as a source of silica, the MnO2 affect most of the properties of the glass system under investigation. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B. V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据