4.1 Article

Impact of fetal growth on pregnancy outcomes in women with severe preeclampsia

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2017.02.002

关键词

Small for gestational age; Maternal outcomes; Neonatal outcomes; Preeclampsia; Severe preeclampsia

资金

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [66329]
  2. NIH [5T32HD055172-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To estimate whether pregnancy outcomes in women with severe preeclampsia (sPE) with small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses differ from those with sPE without SGA or isolated SGA. Study design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive non-anomalous, livebirths in a single tertiary care institution from 2004 to 2008. We compared pregnancy outcomes in women who had sPE with SGA (birthweight < 10th percentile), and sPE without SGA to those with isolated SGA as reference. The primary outcome was a neonatal composite score including low 5-min APGAR, NICU admission and neonatal death. Secondary outcomes were components of the composite as well as placental abruption and cesarean delivery. Analysis was repeated with SGA defined as birthweight < 5th percentile. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Results: 1905 women met inclusion criteria: 156 sPE with SGA, 746 sPE without SGA, 1003 isolated SGA. The risk of the neonatal composite score was higher for sPE with SGA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-3.79) and sPE without SGA (aOR 3.66; 95% CI 2.71-4.93) compared to isolated SGA. The risk of abruption and cesarean were similarly increased in women with sPE with SGA and sPE without SGA compared to those with isolated SGA. Conclusion: Similar to women with sPE without SGA fetus, women who have sPE with SGA are at a higher risk for several adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to isolated SGA. These findings suggest that women with preeclampsia and SGA should be managed as sPE rather than as isolated SGA. (C) 2017 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据