4.7 Article

Perturbed black holes in Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Stability, ringdown, and gravitational-wave emission

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 94, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104024

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [MaGRaTh-646597]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [232804/2014-1]
  3. DFG Research Training Group [1620]
  4. FP7, Marie Curie Actions, People, International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [IRSES-606096]
  5. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  6. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie [690904]
  8. FCT-Portugal [IF/00293/2013]
  9. H2020-MSCA-RISE [StronGrHEP-690904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gravitational waves emitted by distorted black holes-such as those arising from the coalescence of two neutron stars or black holes-carry not only information about the corresponding spacetime but also about the underlying theory of gravity. Although general relativity remains the simplest, most elegant, and viable theory of gravitation, there are generic and robust arguments indicating that it is not the ultimate description of the gravitational universe. Here, we focus on a particularly appealing extension of general relativity, which corrects Einstein's theory through the addition of terms which are second order in curvature: the topological Gauss-Bonnet invariant coupled to a dilaton. We study gravitational-wave emission from black holes in this theory and (i) find strong evidence that black holes are linearly (mode) stable against both axial and polar perturbations, (ii) discuss how the quasinormal modes of black holes can be excited during collisions involving black holes, and finally (iii) show that future ringdown detections with a large signal-to-noise ratio would improve current constraints on the coupling parameter of the theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据