4.4 Article

Improved B cell development in humanized NOD-scid IL2Rγnull mice transgenically expressing human stem cell factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-3

期刊

IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 427-440

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/iid3.124

关键词

B cells; cytokine; hematopoietic stem cells; humanized mice; SCID

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R24 OD018259-01]
  2. NIAID [CA034196, R21 AI103650]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Immunodeficient mice engrafted with human immune systems support studies of human hematopoiesis and the immune response to human-specific pathogens. A significant limitation of these humanized mouse models is, however, a severely restricted ability of human B cells to undergo class switching and produce antigen-specific IgG after infection or immunization. Methods: In this study, we have characterized the development and function of human B cells in NOD-scid IL2R gamma(null) (NSG) mice transgenically expressing human stem cell factor (SCF), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-SF), and IL-3 (NSG-SGM3) following engraftment with human hematopoietic stem cells, autologous fetal liver, and thymic tissues (bone marrow, liver, thymus or BLT model). The NSG-SGM3 BLT mice engraft rapidly with human immune cells and develop T cells, B cells, and myeloid cells. Results: A higher proportion of human B cells developing in NSG-SGM3 BLT mice had a mature/naive phenotype with a corresponding decrease in immature/transitional human B cells as compared to NSG BLT mice. In addition, NSG-SGM3 BLT mice have higher basal levels of human IgM and IgG as compared with NSG BLT mice. Moreover, dengue virus infection of NSG-SGM3 BLT mice generated higher levels of antigen-specific IgM and IgG, a result not observed in NSG BLT mice. Conclusions: Our studies suggest that NSG-SGM3 BLT mice show improved human B cell development and permit the generation of antigen-specific antibody responses to viral infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据