4.6 Article

Glioma-induced SIRT1-dependent activation of hMOF histone H4 lysine 16 acetyltransferase in microglia promotes a tumor supporting phenotype

期刊

ONCOIMMUNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1382790

关键词

microglia; glioma; SIRT1; hMOF (MYST1/KAT8); H4K16 acetylation

资金

  1. Karolinska Institutet Foundations
  2. Svenska Kulturfonden
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  5. Swedish Research Council
  6. ERA-NET TracInflam
  7. Strategic Research Programme in Cancer (StratCan)
  8. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  9. Swedish Cancer Society
  10. Swedish Brain Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-grade gliomas are malignant aggressive primary brain tumors with limited therapeutic options, and dismal prognosis for patients. Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, are recruited and reprogrammed into tumor-supporting cells by glioma cells, which in turn positively influence tumor expansion and infiltration into surrounding brain tissues. Here, we report that glioma-induced microglia conversion is coupled to an increase of histone H4 lysine 16 (H4K16) acetylation level in microglia, through increased nuclear localization of the deacetylase SIRT1, which in turn results in deacetylation of the H4K16 acetyltransferase hMOF and its recruitment to the chromatin at promoter regions of microglial target genes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that manipulation of the microglial H4K16 acetylation level, taking advantage of the intrinsic H4K16 deacetylase or acetyltransferase activities of SIRT1 and hMOF, respectively, modulated the tumor-supporting function of microglia. This study provides evidence that post-translational modifications of histones and the histone-modifying enzymes controlling them, such as H4K16 acetylation regulated by hMOF and SIRT1, are part of the microglial pro-tumoral activation pathway initiated by glioma cancer cells and represent potentially novel therapeutic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据