4.8 Article

Maternal inheritance of bifidobacterial communities and bifidophages in infants through vertical transmission

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0282-6

关键词

Microbiota; Virome; Microbiome; Bifidobacteria; Vertical transmission

资金

  1. Fondazione Caritro, Trento, Italy
  2. GenProbio srl of the Laboratory of Probiogenomics
  3. EU Joint Programming Initiative-A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life (JPI HDHL)
  4. DvS [15/JP/HDHL/3280]
  5. MIUR
  6. Fondazione Cariparma, Parma, Italy
  7. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), through the Irish Government's National Development Plan [SFI/12/RC/2273]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The correct establishment of the human gut microbiota represents a crucial development that commences at birth. Different hypotheses propose that the infant gut microbiota is derived from, among other sources, the mother's fecal/vaginal microbiota and human milk. Results: The composition of bifidobacterial communities of 25 mother-infant pairs was investigated based on an internal transcribed spacer (ITS) approach, combined with cultivation-mediated and genomic analyses. We identified bifidobacterial strains/communities that are shared between mothers and their corresponding newborns. Notably, genomic analyses together with growth profiling assays revealed that bifidobacterial strains that had been isolated from human milk are genetically adapted to utilize human milk glycans. In addition, we identified particular bacteriophages specific of bifidobacterial species that are common in the viromes of mother and corresponding child. Conclusions: This study highlights the transmission of bifidobacterial communities from the mother to her child and implies human milk as a potential vehicle to facilitate this acquisition. Furthermore, these data represent the first example of maternal inheritance of bifidobacterial phages, also known as bifidophages in infants following a vertical transmission route.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据