4.1 Article

Development of a prototype blood fractionation cartridge for plasma analysis by paper spray mass spectrometry

期刊

CLINICAL MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 18-24

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinms.2016.12.002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug monitoring of biofluids is often time consuming and prohibitively expensive. Analysis of dried blood spots offers advantages, such as reduced sample volume, but depends on extensive sample preparation and the presence of a trained lab technician. Paper spray mass spectrometry allows rapid analysis of small molecules from blood spots with minimal sample preparation, however, plasma is often the preferred matrix for bioanalysis. Plasma spots can be analyzed by paper spray MS, but a centrifugation step to isolate the plasma is required. We demonstrate here the development of a paper spray cartridge containing a plasma fractionation membrane to perform automatic on-cartridge plasma fractionation from whole blood samples. Three commercially available blood fractionation membranes were evaluated based on: 1) accuracy of drug concentration determination in plasma, and 2) extent of cell lysis and/or penetration. The accuracy of drug concentration determination was quantitatively determined using high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). While the fractionation membranes were capable of yielding plasma samples with low levels of cell lysis, the membranes did exhibit drug binding to varying degrees, as indicated by a decrease in the drug concentration relative to plasma obtained by centrifugation. Using the membrane exhibiting the lowest binding, we developed a composite paper spray cartridge incorporating the selected fractionation membrane. Quantitative analysis of the plasma samples by paper spray MS yielded results similar to those found with HPLC-MS, but without the need for offline extraction or chromatography. (C) 2016 The Association for Mass Spectrometry: Applications to the Clinical Lab (MSACL). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据