4.7 Article

Prognostic value of CT findings to predict survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single institutional study of 161 patients

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 1320-1329

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3943-5

关键词

Pancreas; Neuroendocrine neoplasm; Overall survival; Recurrence free survival; CT

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, South Korea [2012R1A1A1012731]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To evaluate the prognostic value of CT to predict recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs). Methods Between January 2004 and December 2012, 161 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative triphasic CT and surgical resection with curative intent for PanNENs were identified. The tumour consistency, margin, presence of calcification, pancreatic duct dilatation, bile duct dilatation, vascular invasion, and hepatic metastases were evaluated. The tumour size, arterial enhancement ratio, and portal enhancement ratio were measured. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the association between CT features and recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Results By multivariate analysis, tumour size (> 3 cm) (hazard ratio, 3.314; p = 0.006), portal enhancement ratio (a parts per thousand currency sign1.1) (hazard ratio, 2.718; p = 0.006), and hepatic metastases (hazard ratio, 4.374; p = 0.003) were independent significant variables for worse recurrence-free survival. Portal enhancement ratio (a parts per thousand currency sign1.1) (hazard ratio, 5.951; p = 0.001) and hepatic metastases (hazard ratio, 4.122; p = 0.021) were independent significant variables for worse overall survival. Conclusions Portal enhancement ratio (a parts per thousand currency sign1.1) and hepatic metastases assessed on CT were common independent prognostic factors for worse recurrence-free survival and overall survival in patients with PanNENs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据