4.7 Article

Terrestrial ecosystem process model Biome-BGCMuSo v4.0: summary of improvements and new modeling possibilities

期刊

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 4405-4437

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-4405-2016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [MTA PD 450012]
  2. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA K104816]
  3. BioVeL project (Biodiversity Virtual e-Laboratory Project) [FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2011-2, 283359]
  4. EU FP7 WHEALBI Project [613556]
  5. Croatian Science Foundation Installation Research Project EFFEctivity [HRZZ-UIP-11-2013-2492]
  6. metaprogramme Adaptation of Agriculture and Forests to Climate Change (AAFCC) of the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The process-based biogeochemical model Biome-BGC was enhanced to improve its ability to simulate carbon, nitrogen, and water cycles of various terrestrial ecosystems under contrasting management activities. Biome-BGC version 4.1.1 was used as a base model. Improvements included addition of new modules such as the multilayer soil module, implementation of processes related to soil moisture and nitrogen balance, soil-moisture-related plant senescence, and phenological development. Vegetation management modules with annually varying options were also implemented to simulate management practices of grasslands (mowing, grazing), croplands (ploughing, fertilizer application, planting, harvesting), and forests (thinning). New carbon and nitrogen pools have been defined to simulate yield and soft stem development of herbaceous ecosystems. The model version containing all developments is referred to as Biome-BGCMuSo (Biome-BGC with multilayer soil module; in this paper, Biome-BGCMuSo v4.0 is documented). Case studies on a managed forest, cropland, and grassland are presented to demonstrate the effect of model developments on the simulation of plant growth as well as on carbon and water balance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据