4.7 Article

Free DICOM de-identification tools in clinical research: functioning and safety of patient privacy

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 3685-3695

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3794-0

关键词

DICOM Freeware Tools; Patient Data Privacy; Anonymisation and Pseudonymisation; Data Protection; Anonymous Testing

资金

  1. ZonMw Innovative Medical Devices Initiative (IMDI) [104002003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To compare non-commercial DICOM toolkits for their de-identification ability in removing a patient's personal health information (PHI) from a DICOM header. Ten DICOM toolkits were selected for de-identification tests. Tests were performed by using the system's default de-identification profile and, subsequently, the tools' best adjusted settings. We aimed to eliminate fifty elements considered to contain identifying patient information. The tools were also examined for their respective methods of customization. Only one tool was able to de-identify all required elements with the default setting. Not all of the toolkits provide a customizable de-identification profile. Six tools allowed changes by selecting the provided profiles, giving input through a graphical user interface (GUI) or configuration text file, or providing the appropriate command-line arguments. Using adjusted settings, four of those six toolkits were able to perform full de-identification. Only five tools could properly de-identify the defined DICOM elements, and in four cases, only after careful customization. Therefore, free DICOM toolkits should be used with extreme care to prevent the risk of disclosing PHI, especially when using the default configuration. In case optimal security is required, one of the five toolkits is proposed. aEuro cent Free DICOM toolkits should be carefully used to prevent patient identity disclosure. aEuro cent Each DICOM tool produces its own specific outcomes from the de-identification process. aEuro cent In case optimal security is required, using one DICOM toolkit is proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据