4.3 Article

Inactivation of genes TEC1 and EFG1 in Candida albicans influences extracellular matrix composition and biofilm morphology

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2017.1385372

关键词

Candida albicans; biofilm; EFG1; TEC1; extracellular matrix

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2014/18804-1, 2016/00256-3]
  2. National Institute in Basic Optics and Applied to Life Sciences (FAPESP) [2014/50857-8]
  3. National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development - CNPq [465360/2014-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Infections caused by Candida spp. have been associated with formation of a biofilm, i.e. a complex microstructure of cells adhering to a surface and embedded within an extracellular matrix (ECM). Methods: The ECMs of a wild-type (WT, SN425) and two Candida albicans mutant strains, Delta/Delta tec1 (CJN2330) and Delta/Delta efg1 (CJN2302), were evaluated. Colony-forming units (cfu), total biomass (mg), water-soluble polysaccharides (WSPs), alkali-soluble polysaccharides (ASPs), proteins (insoluble part of biofilms and matrix proteins), and extracellular DNA (eDNA) were quantified. Variable-pressure scanning electron microscopy and confocal scanning laser microscopy were performed. The biovolume (mu m(3)/mu m(2)) and maximum thickness (mu m) of the biofilms were quantified using COMSTAT2. Results: ASP content was highest in WT (mean +/- SD: 74.5 +/- 22.0 mu g), followed by Delta/Delta tec1 (44.0 +/- 24.1 mu g) and Delta/Delta efg1 (14.7 +/- 5.0 mu g). The protein correlated with ASPs (r = 0.666) and with matrix proteins (r = 0.670) in the WT strain. The population in Delta/Delta efg1 correlated with the protein (r = 0.734) and its biofilms exhibited the lowest biomass and biovolume, and maximum thickness. In Delta/Delta tec1, ASP correlated with eDNA (r = 0.678). Conclusion: ASP production may be linked to C. albicans cell filamentous morphology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据