4.3 Article

Meta-Analysis of Electroacupuncture in Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 652-661

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0885066617708558

关键词

systematic review; transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation; anesthetic drugs; cytokines; immune response

资金

  1. Queensland Health OHMR
  2. NHMRC [1010939]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Acupuncture treatment has been employed in China for over 2500 years and it is used worldwide as analgesia in acute and chronic pain. Acupuncture is also used in general anesthesia (GA). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) in addition to GA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: We searched 3 databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science-from 1965 until January 31, 2017) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients undergoing cardiac surgery and receiving GA alone or GA + EA. As primary outcomes, we investigated the association between GA + EA approach and the dosage of intraoperative anesthetic drugs administered, the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), the postoperative dose of vasoactive drugs, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and the levels of troponin I and cytokines. Results: The initial search yielded 477 citations, but only 7 prospective RCTs enrolling a total of 321 patients were included. The use of GA + EA reduced the dosage of intraoperative anesthetic drugs (P < .05), leading to shorter MV time (P < .01) and ICU stay (P < .05) as well as reduced postoperative dose of vasoactive drugs (P < .001). In addition, significantly lower levels of troponin I (P < .01) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (P < .01) were observed. Conclusion: The complementary use of EA for open-heart surgery reduces the duration of MV and ICU stay, blunts the inflammatory response, and might have protective effects on the heart. Our findings stimulate future RCT to provide definitive recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据