4.6 Article

Hierarchical equations of motion approach to transport through an Anderson impurity coupled to interacting Luttinger liquid leads

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 94, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235411

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [HA 7380/1-1, SFB 925]
  2. Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging
  3. Landesexzellenzinitiative Hamburg
  4. Joachim Hertz Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We generalize the hierarchical equations of motionmethod to study electron transport through a quantum dot or molecule coupled to one-dimensional interacting leads that can be described as Luttinger liquids. Such leads can be realized, for example, by quantum wires or fractional quantum Hall edge states. In comparison to noninteracting metallic leads, Luttinger liquid leads involve many-body correlations and the single-particle tunneling density of states shows a power-law singularity at the chemical potential. Using the generalized hierarchical equations of motionmethod, we assess the importance of the singularity and the next-to-leading order many-body correlations. To this end, we compare numerically converged results with second-and first-order results of the hybridization expansion that is inherent to our method. As a test case, we study transport through a single-level quantum dot or molecule that can be described by an Anderson impurity model. Cotunneling effects turn out to be most pronounced for attractive interactions in the leads or repulsive ones if an excitonic coupling between the dot and the leads is realized. We also find that an interaction-induced negative differential conductance near the Coulomb blockade thresholds is slightly suppressed as compared to a first-order and/or rate equation result. Moreover, we find that the two-particle (n-particle) correlations enter as a second-order (n-order) effect and are, thus, not very pronounced at the high temperatures and parameters that we consider.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据