4.7 Article

Role of matter in extended quasidilaton massive gravity

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 94, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.123510

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Science and Technologies Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/L00044X/1]
  2. UK Science and Technologies Facilities Council [ST/K00090X/1, ST/N000668/1]
  3. European Research Council [646702]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [24540256]
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K00090X/1, ST/N000668/1, ST/L00044X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24540256] Funding Source: KAKEN
  8. STFC [ST/L00044X/1, ST/K00090X/1, ST/N000668/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extended quasidilaton theory is one of the simplest Lorentz-invariant massive gravity theories which can accommodate a stable self-accelerating vacuum solution. In this paper we revisit this theory and study the effect of matter fields. For a matter sector that couples minimally to the physical metric, we find hints of a Jeans type instability in the IR. In the analogue k-essence field setup, this instability manifests itself as an IR ghost for the scalar field perturbation, but this can be interpreted as a classical instability that becomes relevant below some momentum scale in terms of matter density perturbations. We also consider the effect of the background evolution influenced by matter on the stability of the gravity sector perturbations. In particular, we address the previous claims of ghost instability in the IR around the late time attractor. We show that, although the matter-induced modification of the evolution potentially brings tension to the stability conditions, one goes beyond the regime of validity of the effective theory well before the solutions become unstable. We also draw attention to the fact that the IR stability conditions are also enforced by the existence requirements of consistent background solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据