4.4 Article

Intersection of neighborhood dynamics and socioeconomic status in small-area walkability: the Heart Healthy Hoods project

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12942-017-0095-7

关键词

Physical activity; Neighborhood/pace; Urbanisation; GIS

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP)/ERC Starting Grant HeartHealthyHoods [336893]
  2. Enrique Najera grant for Young Epidemiologists (12th edition) - Sociedad Espanola
  3. Obra Social La Caixa
  4. Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future-Lerner Fellowship
  5. VicHealth
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence in Healthy, Liveable Communities [1061404]
  7. Australian Prevention Partnership Centre [9100001]
  8. NHMRC
  9. ACT Health
  10. NSW Health
  11. Australian National Preventive Health Agency
  12. Hospitals' Contribution Fund of Australia
  13. HCF Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies found a complex relationship between area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and walkability. These studies did not include neighborhood dynamics. Our aim was to study the association between area-level SES and walkability in the city of Madrid (Spain) evaluating the potential effect modification of neighborhood dynamics. Methods: All census sections of the city of Madrid (n = 2415) were included. Area-level SES was measured using a composite index of 7 indicators in 4 domains (education, wealth, occupation and living conditions). Two neighborhood dynamics factors were computed: gentrification, proxied by change in education levels in the previous 10 years, and neighborhood age, proxied by median year of construction of housing units in the area. Walkability was measured using a composite index of 4 indicators (Residential Density, Population Density, Retail Destinations and Street Connectivity). We modeled the association using linear mixed models with random intercepts. Results: Area-level SES and walkability were inversely and significantly associated. Areas with lower SES showed the highest walkability. This pattern did not hold for areas with an increase in education level, where the association was flat (no decrease in walkability with higher SES). Moreover, the association was attenuated in newly built areas: the association was stronger in areas built before 1975, weaker in areas built between 1975 and 1990 and flat in areas built from 1990 on. Conclusion: Areas with higher neighborhood socioeconomic status had lower walkability in Madrid. This disadvantage in walkability was not present in recently built or gentrified areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据