4.6 Article

Multi-Hop LoRa Networks Enabled by Concurrent Transmission

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 21430-21446

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2755858

关键词

LoRa; concurrent transmission; multi-hop networks; mesh networks; communication networks; relay networks; ad hoc networks

资金

  1. Cross-Ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program, Infrastructure Maintenance, Renewal and Management Technology
  2. JSPS [JP16H02358]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16J08682]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we strive to construct an efficient multi-hop network based on the sub-GHz low power wide-area technology. Specifically, we investigate the combination of LoRa, a physical-layer standard that can provide several-kilometer outdoor coverage, and concurrent transmission (CT), a recently proposed multi-hop protocol that can significantly improve the network efficiency. The main contributions of this paper are threefold. 1) Since the CT enhances the network efficiency by allowing synchronized packet collisions, the performance of the physical-layer receiver under such packet collisions needs to be carefully examined to ensure the network reliability. We first extensively evaluate the LoRa receiver performance under CT to verify that LoRa is compatible to CT. Specifically, we find that, due to the time-domain and frequency domain energy spreading effect, LoRa is robust to the packet collisions resulting from CT. 2) We further find the receiver performance under CT can be further improved by introducing timing offsets between the relaying packets. In view of this, we propose a timing delay insertion method, the offset-CT method, that adds random timing delay before the packets while preventing the timing offset from diverging over the multi-hop network. 3) We conduct proof-of-concept experiments to demonstrate the feasibility of CT-based LoRa multi-hop network and the performance improvement brought by the proposed offset-CT method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据