4.6 Article

Batch Process Monitoring Based on Multiway Global Preserving Kernel Slow Feature Analysis

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 2696-2710

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2672780

关键词

Batch process; slow feature analysis; process monitoring; kernel trick; global structure analysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61403418, 61273160]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2014FL016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an effective nonlinear dynamic data analysis tool, kernel slow feature analysis (KSFA) has achieved great success in continuous process monitoring field during recent years. However, its application to batch process monitoring is unexploited, which is a more challenging task because of the complicated characteristics of batch process data. In this paper, we propose a novel batch process monitoring method based on the modified KSFA method, referred to as multiway global preserving kernel slow feature analysis (MGKSFA), to capture high nonlinearity and inherently time-varying dynamics of process data. In the proposed method, a two-step multiway data unfolding strategy is first utilized to convert the three-way batch process training data set into a two-way matrix. Then, the global structure preserving-based kernel slow feature analysis (GKSFA) is used to build the nonlinear statistical monitoring model, which not only explores the local dynamic data relationships but also considers the mining of global data structure information. Furthermore, a rule based on the cumulative slowness contribution is designed to determine the number of the retained slow features. Last, two monitoring statistics T-2 and SPE are built to detect the process faults. Two case studies, including one simple numerical nonlinear system and the benchmark fed-batch penicillin fermentation process, are used to demonstrate that the proposed MGKSFA method has the superior fault detection performance over the traditional batch process monitoring methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据