4.6 Article

Review on Clustering, Coverage and Connectivity in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Communication Techniques Perspective

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 11176-11199

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2713640

关键词

Clustering; connectivity; coverage; RF; MI; UWFSO; acoustic; underwater wireless sensor networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With a wide scope to explore and harness the oceanic sources of interest, the field of underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) is attracting a growing interest of researchers. Owing to the real-time remote data monitoring requirements, underwater acoustic sensor networks (UASNs) emerged as a preferred network to a great extent. In UASN, the limited availability and non-rechargeability of energy resources along with the relative inaccessibility of deployed sensor nodes for energy replenishments necessitated the evolution of several energy optimization techniques. Clustering is one such technique that increases system scalability and reduces energy consumption. Besides clustering, coverage and connectivity are two significant properties that decide the proper detection and communication of events of interest in UWSN due to unstable underwater environment. Underwater communication is also possible with non-acoustic communication techniques like radio frequency, magnetic induction, and underwater free-space optics. In this paper, we surveyed clustering, coverage, and connectivity issues of UASN and qualitatively compared their performance. Particularly, the impact of these non-conventional communication techniques on clustering, coverage, and connectivity aspects is demonstrated. Additionally, we highlighted some key open issues related to the UWSN. This paper provides a broad view of existing algorithms of clustering, coverage, and connectivity based on acoustic communication. It also provides a useful guidance to the researchers in UWSN from various other communication techniques' perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据