4.2 Article

Relations Among Social Support, PTSD Symptoms, and Substance Use in Veterans

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 764-770

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/adb0000205

关键词

posttraumatic stress disorder; social support; alcohol; veterans

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [DA030143]
  2. Department of Veteran Affairs [CX000845]
  3. National Institute on Child Health and Human Development
  4. Office of Research on Women's Health [K12HD055885]
  5. National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [T32AA007474]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social support plays a significant role in the development, maintenance, and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, there has been little investigation of social support with PTSD and its frequent comorbid conditions and related symptoms. Substance use disorders (SUDs) are 1 set of conditions that have yet to be investigated in combination with PTSD and social support. As compared with civilians, veterans are at increased risk for developing both PTSD and SUD. In this study, veterans (N = 171) with symptoms of PTSD (76% met diagnostic criteria) and SUD (83% met diagnostic criteria for any dependence) were recruited and completed clinician-rated and self-report measures of PTSD, SUD, and social support. Overall, low social support was reported in the sample. When controlled for the other disorder's symptoms, PTSD symptoms demonstrated a significant negative relation and SUD symptoms demonstrated a significant positive relation to social support. The PTSD findings are consistent with previous studies on PTSD and social support without SUD comorbidity. However, the SUD findings are inconsistent with previous studies, which focused primarily on older veterans. Together, these findings highlight the significance of social support in individuals with PTSD and SUD and promote future research within comorbid presentations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据