4.6 Article

Joint Design of User Association and Power Allocation With Proportional Fairness in Massive MIMO HetNets

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 6560-6569

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2695572

关键词

Massive MIMO HetNets; joint optimization; proportional fairness; user association; power allocation

资金

  1. 863 Program of China [2015AA01A703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61372101, 61422105, 61531011, 61671144]
  3. Research Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2015156]
  4. Funding of Supporting Excellent Young Professors for Teaching and Research in Southeast University
  5. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the massive MIMO enabled heterogeneous networks (HetNets) can intensify the spectral efficiency benefits, the proper user association and resource allocation are both crucial to achieve desirable performance since the power consumption of base station (BS) scales with the large number of antennas. This paper aims to investigate joint design of user association and power allocation with loads constraint and transmit power constraint for the massive MIMO HetNets by considering proportional fairness about the spectral efficiency under imperfect channel state information. First, we derive a closed-form lower bound on the ergodic spectral efficiency with linear zero-forcing beamforming, based on which, a mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem is formulated. It is difficult to efficiently obtain an exact solution since it is non-convex and combinational. To solve this NP-hard problem, an effective algorithm with guaranteed convergence is proposed, where the original problem is decomposed into the corresponding subproblems, which can be solved by low complexity approaches, respectively. Numerical results show that how the number of antennas and the number of BSs affect the spectral efficiency, and our proposed algorithm outperforms other algorithms in terms of the spectral efficiency and load balancing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据