4.6 Article

Towards multicaloric effect with ferroelectrics

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 94, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.214113

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-#1361713]
  2. DOE Ames Laboratory on The Caloric Materials Consortium
  3. ARO [W911NF-16- 1-0227]
  4. French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the Investissements d'Avenir program [ANR-10-LABX-0035]
  5. Fonds National de la Recherche du Luxembourg (FNR) through InterMobility Project [16/1159210]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing thermal changes in solid-state materials strategically offers caloric-based alternatives to replace current vapor-compression technology. To make full use of multiple forms of the entropy and achieve higher efficiency for designs of cooling devices, the multicaloric effect appears as a cutting-edge concept encouraging researchers to search for multicaloric materials with outstanding caloric properties. Here we report the multicaloric effect in BaTiO3 single crystals driven simultaneously by mechanical and electric fields and described via a thermodynamic phenomenological model. It is found that the multicaloric behavior is mainly dominated by the mechanical field rather than the electric field, since the paraelectric-to-ferroelectric transition is more sensitive to mechanical field than to electric field. The use of uniaxial stress competes favorably with pressure due to its much higher caloric strength and negligible elastic thermal change. It is revealed that multicaloric response can be significantly larger than just the sum of mechanocaloric and electrocaloric effects in temperature regions far above the Curie temperature but cannot exceed this limit near the Curie temperature. Our results also show the advantage of the multicaloric effect over the mechanically mediated electrocaloric effect or electrically mediated mechanocaloric effect. Our findings therefore highlight the importance of ferroelectric materials to develop multicaloric cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据