4.7 Article

Kinetics of Oxidation of Iodide (I-) and Hypoiodous Acid (HOI) by Peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and Formation of Iodinated Products in the PMS/I-/NOM System

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00471

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578203, 51378316]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0401107]
  3. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015T80366]
  4. Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT) [2016DX13]
  5. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [201346]
  6. Heilongjiang Province Natural Science Foundation [QC2014C055]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the kinetics of transformation of iodide (I-) and hypoiodous acid (HOI) by peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and potential formation of worrisome iodinated products in the presence of natural organic matter (NOM) were investigated. As the pH increased from 5 to 10, the apparent second-order rate constants of reaction of PMS with I- gradually decreased from 1.01 x 10(3) to 3.86 x 10(2) M-1 while those for HOI increased dramatically from 1.08 x 10(2) to 7.90 x 10(4) M-1 s(-1). The obtained pH dependent rate profiles were explained well by the effects of pH-affected speciation of PMS and/or HOI. Considerable amounts of total organic iodine (TOI) could be formed in the PMS/I-/NOM system over a wide pH range. Under similar conditions, the TOI levels formed in the PMS/I-/NOM system were generally higher than those formed in the case of HOCl but much lower than those formed in the case of NH2Cl. Also, specific iodoform (IF) and monoiodoacetic acid (MIAA) were detected in both simulated and authentic waters during treatment with PMS. This work for the first time demonstrates the potential formation of worrisome iodinated products during water treatment with PMS, and this has important implications for its application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据