4.2 Article

Allelopathic effect of β-cembrenediol and its mode of action: Induced oxidative stress in lettuce seedlings

期刊

EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 441-449

出版社

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIV
DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2016-09-1263

关键词

beta-Cembrenediol; Phytotoxicity; Lettuce; Oxidative stress; Reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570354, 21302195, 31300290]
  2. Agricultural Biotechnology Research and Development Program of Gansu Province [GNSW-2015-25]
  3. Research and Development Project of New Technology and Equipment of Special Program in the Field of Agriculture Ecological Environment Protection of Gansu Province
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Cooperation Program to Gansu Province of Lanzhou Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-cembrenediol ((1S,2E,4R,6R,7E,11E)-2,7,11-cembratriene-4,6-diol), shown to be one of the most important allelochemicals of tobacco in previous studies, effectively inhibited the root and stem growth of receptor plants and the inhibitory effects was concentration-dependent. However, its mechanism of action remains unclear. Seedlings of lettuce (Tai Yuan Sun) were treated with beta-cembrenediol to clarify its mode of action. Results showed that beta-cembrenediol significantly inhibited the seedling growth and reduced fresh weight of L. sativa. The compounds effectively affected cell mitotic index and caused cell death. Exposure to beta-cembrenediol induced overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Moreover, increased content of hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, and proline, and decreased in chlorophyll content indicated lipid peroxidation and induction of oxidative stress. These results suggested that beta-cembrenediol caused oxidative damage through enhanced generation of ROS, as indicated by increased lipid peroxidation, disruption of membrane integrity and impacted mitosis, ultimately resulted in growth inhibition of the receptor plant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据