4.3 Article

Response assessment with the CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography tracer [68Ga] Pentixafor in a patient with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of the orbital cavities

期刊

EJNMMI RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0294-z

关键词

Chemokine receptor; CXCR4; Lymphoma; [Ga-68]Pentixafor; PET; Response assessment

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB824]
  2. DFG [KE 222/7-1]
  3. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CXCR4 belongs to the family of chemokine receptors. Together with its sole known ligand CXCL12 (SDF-1alpha), it has a pivotal role during organogenesis and for homing of hematopoietic stem cells. CXCR4 is overexpressed in various malignancies, and this is often associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, molecular imaging of CXCR4 bears a great potential for diagnostics and selecting patients for CXCR4-directed therapies. The CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [Ga-68] Pentixafor has been shown to visualize CXCR4 expression in various malignancies in vivo. Whereas this tracer has limitations compared to F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([F-18] FDG) in diagnostic PET imaging in peripheral tumour lesions, it might add valuable information in routine diagnostics and response assessment of tumours in close proximity to the central nervous system (CNS) and malignancies within this organ. As a proof-of-concept, we performed [Ga-68] Pentixafor PET imaging in a patient with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) of the orbital cavities at diagnosis and for post-therapy response assessment. Compared to routinely conducted [F-18] FDG PET, the lymphoma lesions determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed high tracer accumulation at diagnosis, which decreased upon treatment. We therefore propose that imaging of CXCR4 with [Ga-68] Pentixafor is a potential diagnostic tool for tumours close to or within the CNS and suggest this being studied in clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据