4.7 Article

Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead

期刊

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 264-272

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012

关键词

Ecosystem service demand; Ecosystem service bundles; Ecosystem service supply; Optimization; Spatio-temporal scales; Stakeholders

资金

  1. BiodivERsA/FACCE-JPI joint call
  2. BMBF - German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01 LC 1404 A]
  3. Helmholtz Programme 'Terrestrial Environment'
  4. Helmholtz Research School for Ecosystem Services under Changing Land Use and Climate (ESCALATE) - Helmholtz Association [VH-KO-613]
  5. Becas Chile-DAAD pre-doctoral fellowship (Government of Chile) [A1086435]
  6. Becas Chile-DAAD pre-doctoral fellowship (German Academic Exchange service) [A1086435]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecosystem services (ES), the benefits that humans obtain from nature, are of great importance for human well-being. The challenge of meeting the growing human demands for natural resources while sustaining essential ecosystem functions and resilience requires an in-depth understanding of the complex relationships between ES. These conflicting ('trade-offs') or synergistic ('synergies') relationships mean that changes in one ES can cause changes in other ES. By synthesizing the growing body of literature on ES relationships, we identified the following four main study objectives: (i) the identification and characterization of co-occurrences of ES, (ii) the identification of drivers that shape ES relationships, (iii) the exploration of biophysical constraints of landscapes and limitations to their multifunctionality, and (iv) the support of environmental planning, management and policy decisions. For each of these objectives we here describe the key concepts, including viewpoints of different disciplines, and highlight the major challenges that need to be addressed. We identified three cross-cutting themes being relevant to all four main types of studies. To help guiding researchers towards more systematic analyses of ES trade-offs and synergies, we conclude with an outlook on suggested future research priorities. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据