4.7 Article

Modeling daily soil salinity dynamics in response to agricultural and environmental changes in coastal Bangladesh

期刊

EARTHS FUTURE
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 495-514

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016EF000530

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) program [NE-J002755-1]
  2. Department for International Development (DFID)
  3. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  4. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  5. UK British Council INSPIRE R-4 program
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [bgs05019, NE/J002852/1, NE/J002755/1, noc010010] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NERC [bgs05019, noc010010, NE/J002852/1, NE/J002755/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the dynamics of salt movement in the soil is a prerequisite for devising appropriate management strategies for land productivity of coastal regions, especially low-lying delta regions, which support many millions of farmers around the world. At present, there are no numerical models able to resolve soil salinity at regional scale and at daily time steps. In this research, we develop a novel holistic approach to simulate soil salinization comprising an emulator-based soil salt and water balance calculated at daily time steps. The method is demonstrated for the agriculture areas of coastal Bangladesh (similar to 20,000 km(2)). This shows that we can reproduce the dynamics of soil salinity under multiple land uses, including rice crops, combined shrimp and rice farming, as well as non-rice crops. The model also reproduced well the observed spatial soil salinity for the year 2009. Using this approach, we have projected the soil salinity for three different climate ensembles, including relative sea-level rise for the year 2050. Projected soil salinity changes are significantly smaller than other reported projections. The results suggest that inter-season weather variability is a key driver of salinization of agriculture soils at coastal Bangladesh.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据