3.8 Proceedings Paper

On the Use of Interfacial Tension Parameter to Predict Reduction of Friction by Mold Coatings in Injection Molding of Polyamide 6

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4965457

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first contact of liquid hot polymer melt to mold surface while injection is a pressure-supported wetting process. After filling is completed, the melt is cooled down to a solid part, which is finally ejected. This separation of solid polymer from solid mold surface is considered to be a dewetting process. The wetting parameter interfacial tension gamma(12) estimates the resistance of a liquid-solid interface to be separated under external load. If gamma(12) also predicts the resistance of solid-solid interface to be separated under external load, gamma(12) could be used to improve mold coatings for reducing friction in injection molding. Based on the analysis of gamma(12) equation, the following hypothesis is stated: Low gamma(12) of a polymer - mold coating interface indicates elevated friction and vice versa. This has been examined in a series of experimental tests. First, from 40 to 200 degrees C, contact angles of test liquids bromonaphtalene and ethylencarbonate were captured on solid Polyamide 6 (PA6, Durethan B30S) and on mold coatings a-C:H, CrC/a-C:H, CrN, NbC, NbN, and MoN. Every specimen's surface energy was determined using the OWRK method. All materials show a distinct temperature dependence of surface energy and its polar and disperse fractions. Then, gamma(12) of the mold coatings to PA6 was calculated for a temperature of 90 degrees C. Finally, same PA 6 and the coated specimen were tested in a friction test injection mold. The static coefficient of friction mu(0) was determined at a friction contact temperature of 90 degrees C. As expected, most coatings rank in friction to PA6 as gamma(12) suggests, i.e. friction decreases from MoN, a-C: H, NbC, NbN, CrN, to CrC/a-C:H, while gamma(12) increases from MoN, a-C:H, NbN, NbC, CrN, to CrC/a-C:H.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据