4.4 Article

Protective effect of gallic acid derivatives from the freshwater green alga Spirogyra sp against ultraviolet B-induced apoptosis through reactive oxygen species clearance in human keratinocytes and zebrafish

期刊

ALGAE
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 379-388

出版社

KOREAN SOC PHYCOLOGY
DOI: 10.4490/algae.2017.32.11.29

关键词

apoptosis; gallic acid derivatives; phenolic content; reactive oxygen species; Spirogyra sp.; ultraviolet B

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2013R1A1A2064909]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2064909] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we enhanced the phenolic content of 70% ethanol extracts of Spirogyra sp. (SPE, 260.47 +/- 5.21 gallic acid equivalent [GAE] mg g(-1)), 2.97 times to 774.24 +/- 2.61 GAE mg g(-1) in the ethyl acetate fraction of SPE (SPEE). SPEE was evaluated for its antiradical activity in online high-performance liquid chromatography. ABTS analysis, and the peaks with the highest antiradical activities were identified as gallic acid derivatives containing gallic acid, methyl gallate, and ethyl gallate. Isolation of ethyl gallate from Spirogyra sp. was performed for the first time in this study. In ultraviolet B (UVB)-irradiated keratinocytes (HaCaT cells), SPEE improved cell viability by 8.22%, and 23.33% and reduced accumulation of cells in the sub-G(1) phase by 20.53%, and 32.11% at the concentrations of 50 and 100 mu g mL(-1), respectively. Furthermore, SPEE (50 and 100 mu g mL(-1)) reduced reactive oxygen species generation in UVB-irradiated zebrafish by 66.67% and 77.78%. This study suggests a protective activity of gallic acid and its derivatives from Spirogyra sp. against UVB-induced stress responses in both in vitro and in vivo models, suggesting a potential use of SPEE in photoprotection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据