4.3 Article

A comparison of three approaches to non-stationary flood frequency analysis

期刊

ACTA GEOPHYSICA
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 863-883

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11600-017-0071-4

关键词

Non-stationary flood frequency analysis; Maximum likelihood; Two-stage methodology; GAMLSS; Multimodel approach; Monte Carlo simulations

资金

  1. Polish-Norwegian Research Programme project CHIHE [PolNor/196243/80/2013]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [3841/E-41/S/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-stationary flood frequency analysis (FFA) is applied to statistical analysis of seasonal flow maxima from Polish and Norwegian catchments. Three non-stationary estimation methods, namely, maximum likelihood (ML), two stage (WLS/TS) and GAMLSS (generalized additive model for location, scale and shape parameters), are compared in the context of capturing the effect of non-stationarity on the estimation of time-dependent moments and design quantiles. The use of a multimodel approach is recommended, to reduce the errors due to the model mis-specification in the magnitude of quantiles. The results of calculations based on observed seasonal daily flow maxima and computer simulation experiments showed that GAMLSS gave the best results with respect to the relative bias and root mean square error in the estimates of trend in the standard deviation and the constant shape parameter, while WLS/TS provided better accuracy in the estimates of trend in the mean value. Within three compared methods the WLS/TS method is recommended to deal with non-stationarity in short time series. Some practical aspects of the GAMLSS package application are also presented. The detailed discussion of general issues related to consequences of climate change in the FFA is presented in the second part of the article entitled Around and about an application of the GAMLSS package in non-stationary flood frequency analysis''.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据