4.7 Article

Rheology of sediment transported by a laminar flow

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 94, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.062609

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Army Research Office-Division of Earth Materials and Processes Grant [64455EV]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation Grant [EAR-1224943, INSPIRE/EAR-1344280, MRSEC/DMR-1120901]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1305199] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the dynamics of fluid-driven sediment transport remains challenging, as it occurs at the interface between a granular material and a fluid flow. Boyer, Guazzelli, and Pouliquen [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 188301 (2011)] proposed a local rheology unifying dense dry-granular and viscous-suspension flows, but it has been validated only for neutrally buoyant particles in a confined and homogeneous system. Here we generalize the Boyer, Guazzelli, and Pouliquen model to account for the weight of a particle by addition of a pressure P-0 and test the ability of this model to describe sediment transport in an idealized laboratory river. We subject a bed of settling plastic particles to a laminar-shear flow from above, and use refractive-index-matching to track particles' motion and determine local rheology-from the fluid-granular interface to deep in the granular bed. Data from all experiments collapse onto a single curve of friction mu as a function of the viscous number Iv over the range 3 x 10(-5) <= I-v <= 2, validating the local rheology model. For I-v < 3 x 10(-5), however, data do not collapse. Instead of undergoing a jamming transition with mu -> mu(s) as expected, particles transition to a creeping regime where we observe a continuous decay of the friction coefficient mu <= mu(s) as Iv decreases. The rheology of this creep regime cannot be described by the local model, and more work is needed to determine whether a nonlocal rheology model can be modified to account for our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据