3.8 Article

Single-Molecule Mechanics of Catechol-Iron Coordination Bonds

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 979-989

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00186

关键词

mussel foot protein; dopa; surface adhesion; atomic force microscopy; load-bearing materials

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21522402, 21373109, 11374148, 11334004]
  2. 973 Program of China [2012CB921801, 2013CB834100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal coordination bonds are widely found in natural adhesives and load-bearing and protective materials, in which they are thought to be responsible for the high mechanical strength and toughness. However, it remains unknown how metal ligand complexes could give rise to such superb mechanical properties. Here, we developed a single chain nanoparticle based force spectroscopy to directly quantify the mechanical properties of individual catechol-Fe3+ complexes, the key elements accounting for the high toughness and extensibility of byssal threads of marine mussels. We found that catechol-Fe3+ complexes possess a unique combination of mechanical features, including high mechanical stability, fast reformation kinetics, and stoichiometry-dependent mechanics. Therefore, they can serve as sacrificial bonds to efficiently dissipate energy in the materials, quickly recover the mechanical properties when load is released, and respond to pH and Fe3+ concentrations. Especially, we revealed that the bis-catechol-Fe3+ complex is mechanically similar to 90% stronger than the tris-catechol-Fe3+ complex. Quantum calculation study suggested that the distinction between mechanical strength and thermodynamic stability of catechol-Fe3+ complexes is due to their different mechanical rupture pathways. Our study provides the nanoscale mechanistic understanding of the coordination bond-mediated mechanical properties of biogenetic materials, and could guide future rational design and regulation of the mechanical properties of synthetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据