4.1 Article

Optimal Latin hypercube sampling-based surrogate model in NAPLs contaminated groundwater remediation optimization process

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 333-346

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2017.116

关键词

chance-constrained programming; groundwater contamination remediation; NAPLs; optimal Latin hypercube sampling; surrogate model; uncertainty

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41502221, 41372237]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570274]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A surrogate model based groundwater optimization model was developed to solve the non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) contaminated groundwater remediation optimization problem. To illustrate the impact of sampling method improvement to the surrogate model performance improvement, aiming at a nitrobenzene contaminated groundwater remediation problem, optimal Latin hypercube sampling (OLHS) method was introduced to sample data in the input variables feasible region, and a radial basis function artificial neural network was used to construct a surrogate model. Considering the surrogate model's uncertainty, a chance-constrained programming (CCP) model was constructed, and it was solved by genetic algorithm. The results showed the following, for the problem considered in this study. (1) Compared with the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) method, the OLHS method improves the space-filling degree of sample points considerably. (2) The effects of the two sampling methods on surrogate model performance were analyzed through comparison of goodness of fit, residual and uncertainty. The results indicated that the OLHS-based surrogate model performed better than the LHS-based surrogate model. (3) The optimal remediation strategies at 99%, 95%, 90%, 85%, 80% and 50% confidence levels were obtained, which showed that the remediation cost increased with the confidence level. This work would be helpful for increasing surrogate model performance and lowering the risk of a groundwater remediation strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据