4.4 Article

Comparison of Ultrasonic and Hydrothermal Cavitation Pretreatments of Cattle Manure Mixed with Straw Wheat on Fermentative Biogas Production

期刊

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 747-754

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-017-9977-y

关键词

Lignocellulosic biomass; Ultrasound; Pretreatment; Anaerobic digestion; Methane; Biofuels

资金

  1. University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn [18.610.008-300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposePhysical pretreatment methods using ultrasound and hydrothermal cavitation were compared in the process of mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure mixed with straw wheat.MethodsTo evaluate the anaerobic biodegradability of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass, 20-days batch anaerobic digestion experiments were used.ResultsThe results showed that both methods achieved similar biomass solubilization (ca. 30% as CODsol), but in hydrothermal cavitation the pretreatment time was shorter and energy required was lower than in ultrasonic pretreatment. Solubilization of nitrogen compounds was higher in hydrothermal cavitation. Application of sonication with energy input of 4839kJ/kg TS increased biogas production rate to 177mL/mg VSd, compared to 194mL/mg VSd with hydrothermal cavitation. However, biogas productivity was higher with ultrasound, where biogas enhancement ranged 59.6-64.2% in contrast to 35.6-39.4% hydrothermal cavitation. Both methods did not contribute to increase methane concentration in biogas.ConclusionsThe optimization of pretreatments for the production of biofuels from lignocellulosic residues is needed to be feasible at industrial scale. Physical pretreatment based on cavitation enhanced lignocellulosic biomass solubilization as well as biogas productivity, but the process yield was related to the cavitation equipment and mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据