4.5 Article

Fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution vs normal saline in acute pancreatitis: A triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2050640617707864

关键词

Acute pancreatitis; fluid resuscitation; lactated Ringer's solution; randomized controlled trial; systemic inflammatory response syndrome/prevention and control

资金

  1. AIGPA, an association of researchers in gastroenterology from the province of Alicante, Spain
  2. national Spanish public grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS PI13/00019]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR, FI DGR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Little is known regarding the optimal type of fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis (AP). Objective: The objective of this article was to compare the effect of lactated Ringer's solution (LR) vs normal saline (NS) in the inflammatory response in AP. Methods: We conducted a triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Patients >= 18 admitted with AP were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive LR or NS. Primary outcome variables were number of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria at 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours and blood C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at 48 hours and 72 hours. Invitro complementary experiments were performed to further explore the interaction between pH, lactate and inflammation. Results: Nineteen patients receiving LR and 21 receiving NS were analyzed. The median (p25-p75) number of SIRS criteria at 48 hours were 1 (1-2) for NS vs 1 (0-1) for LR, p=0.060. CRP levels (mg/l) were as follows: at 48 hours NS 166 (78-281) vs LR 28 (3-124), p=0.037; at 72 hours NS 217 (59-323) vs LR 25 (3-169), p=0.043. Invitro, LR inhibited the induction of inflammatory phenotype of macrophages and NF-kappa B activation. This effect was not observed when using Ringer's solution without lactate, suggesting a direct anti-inflammatory effect of lactate. Conclusions: Lactated Ringer's is associated with an anti-inflammatory effect in patients with acute pancreatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据