4.4 Article

Lambari Aquaculture as a Means for the Sustainable Development of Rural Communities in Brazil

期刊

REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 316-330

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/23308249.2017.1320647

关键词

Ecological aquaculture; native species; alternative livelihoods; socio-ecological assessment

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [FAPESP 10/52212-3, FAPESP 2015/02143-9, FAPESP 2016/03085-5]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [CNPq 562820/2010-8, CNPq 406069/2012-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The challenge of developing rural communities is to combine socioeconomic enhancement and environmental conservation. Sustainable aquaculture using low-trophic level native small fish could be an important tool to aid in the challenge. Lambari are a fish group widely distributed on neotropical and subtropical watersheds, which can be a good model for studies on the performance of small fish sustainable aquaculture to develop rural communities. A review of the available information on the status and potential economic and socio-ecological impacts of this innovative initiative is described in this article. A case study of lambari aquaculture in a rural community located in a protected coastal rainforest in southeastern Brazil was also reported. The review showed large diversification in the culture systems and management, and consequently, in the productivity. Poor management practices exist and current science-based information is still insufficient to provide technology to match rural farmer realities or needs. Simple, alternative strategies are needed to improve systems' efficiencies. Nevertheless, with participatory applied science, the aquaculture of indigenous, low-trophic level small fish, such as the lambari, can be an important tool for sustainable food production and development of rural populations, and an alternative income source for poor communities remaining in nature reserves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据