4.7 Article

AGE DEPENDENCE OF WIND PROPERTIES FOR SOLAR-TYPE STARS: A 3D STUDY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 832, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/145

关键词

magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); stars: winds, outflows; stars: magnetic field; stars: rotation; Sun: evolution; methods: numerical

资金

  1. ANR Blanc TOUPIES [SIMI5-6 020 01]
  2. ERC STARS2 [207430]
  3. CNES via Solar Orbiter
  4. GENCI program [1623]
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Young and rapidly rotating stars are known for intense, dynamo-generated magnetic fields. Spectropolarimetric observations of those stars in precisely aged clusters are key input for gyrochronology and magnetochronology. We use Zeeman Doppler imaging maps of several young K-type stars of similar mass and radius but with various ages and rotational periods. to perform three-dimensional (3D). numerical MHD simulations of their coronae and follow the evolution of their magnetic properties with age. Those simulations yield the coronal structure as well as the instant torque exerted by the magnetized, rotating wind on the star. As stars get older, we find that the angular momentum loss decreases with Omega star(3), which is the reason for the convergence on the Skumanich law. For the youngest stars of our sample, the angular momentum loss shows signs of saturation around 8 Omega(circle dot), which is a common value used in spin evolution models for K-type stars. We compare these results to semianalytical models and existing braking laws. We observe a complex wind-speed distribution for the youngest stars with slow, intermediate, and fast wind components, which are the result of. interaction with intense and nonaxisymmetric magnetic fields. Consequently, in our simulations, the stellar wind structure in the equatorial plane of young stars varies significantly from a solar configuration, delivering insight about the past of the solar system interplanetary medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据