4.6 Article

Accurate external localization of the left frontal cortex in dogs by using pointer based frameless neuronavigation

期刊

PEERJ
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3425

关键词

Canine; Non-stereotactic; Brain; Neuronavigation; TMS; Neuropsychiatric disorders

资金

  1. Ghent University Special Research Fund [BOF01J05715]
  2. Ghent University Multidisciplinary Research Partnership

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In humans, non-stereotactic frameless neuronavigation systems are used as a topographical tool for non-invasive brain stimulation methods such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). TMS studies in clogs may provide treatment modalities for several neuropsychological disorders in dogs. Nevertheless, an accurate non-invasive localization of a stimulation target has not yet been performed in this species. Hypothesis. This study was primarily put forward to externally locate the left frontal cortex in 18 healthy dogs by means of a human non-stereotactic neuronavigation system. Secondly, the accuracy of the external localization was assessed. Animals. A total of 18 healthy dogs, drawn at random from the research colony present at the faculty of Veterinary Medicine (Ghent University), were used. Methods. Two sets of coordinates (X, Y, Z and X, Y, Z) were compared on each dog their tornographical dataset. Results. The non-stereotactic neuronavigation system was able to externally locate the frontal cortex in dogs with accuracy comparable with human studies. Conclusion and clinical importance. This result indicates that a non-stereotactic neuronavigation system can accurately externally locate the left frontal cortex and paves the way to use guided non-invasive brain stimulation methods as an alternative treatment procedure for neurological and behavioral disorders in dogs. This technique could, in analogy with human guided non-invasive brain stimulation, provide a better treatment outcome for dogs suffering from anxiety disorders when compared to its non-guided alternative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据