3.8 Article

Forced migration and sexual abuse: experience of Congolese adolescent girls in Kigeme refugee camp, Rwanda

期刊

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REPORT
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 261-271

出版社

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/hpr.2016.59590

关键词

sexual abuse; adolescent; DRC; Rwanda; Kigeme

资金

  1. Norway Grants in the Polish-Norwegian Research Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND This study deals with the link between forced migration and sexual abuse, with a special focus on adolescent girls. Existing literature associates forced migration with sexual abuse and identifies adolescent girls as the most vulnerable. However, little is known about the situation of sexual abuse among Congolese refugees in Rwanda since their arrival in 2012 due to the conflict between Congolese government forces and the M23 rebel group. This study was initiated to explore the situation of sexual abuse of Congolese adolescent girls in Kigeme camp and to suggest remedial strategies. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE Qualitative data were collected through individual interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with adolescent girls. Interviews also involved parents, boys, camp authorities, and neighbouring citizens. RESULTS The findings show that rape, unwanted physical touching, sexual exploitation, commercial sex, early marriage and girl trafficking are the main forms of sexual abuse. These are facilitated by the miserable life in the camp, shortcomings in the camp layout and security system, and adolescent developmental stage. They negatively impact girls' reproductive health, social integration and mental health. CONCLUSIONS anti-GBVExisting strategies to address sexual abuse in the camp have had positive but insufficient results, and thus need to be improved and reinforced. Improvement is suggested in the areas of the abuse reporting system, the camp layout and security system, involvement of men and youth, and the consolidation of anti-GBV (gender-based violence) clubs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据