4.7 Article

Gapmer Antisense Oligonucleotides Suppress the Mutant Allele of COL6A3 and Restore Functional Protein in Ullrich Muscular Dystrophy

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY-NUCLEIC ACIDS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 416-427

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.07.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Muscular Dystrophy UK [RA2/3044]
  2. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
  3. University College London [513408]
  4. Muscular Dystrophy UK [17GRO-PG36-0168, RA2/3044] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0515-10022] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dominant-negative mutations in the genes that encode the three major a chains of collagen type VI, COL6A1, COL6A2, and COL6A3, account for more than 50% of Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy patients and nearly all Bethlem myopathy patients. Gapmer antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) are usually used for gene silencing by stimulating RNA cleavage through the recruitment of an endogenous endonuclease known as RNase H to cleave the RNA strand of a DNA-RNA duplex. In this study, we exploited the application of the allele-specific silencing approach by gapmer AON as a potential therapy for Collagen-VI-related congenital muscular dystrophy (COL6-CMD). A series of AONs were designed to selectively target an 18-nt heterozygous genomic deletion in exon 15 of COL6A3 at the mRNA and pre-mRNA level. We showed that gapmer AONs can selectively suppress the expression of mutant transcripts at both pre-mRNA and mRNA levels, and that the latter strategy had a far stronger efficiency than the former. More importantly, we found that silencing of the mutant transcripts by gapmer AONs increased the deposition of collagen VI protein into the extracellular matrix, thus restoring functional protein production. Our findings provide a clear proof of concept for AON allele-specific silencing as a therapeutic approach for COL6-CMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据