4.2 Article

Forecasting trends in disability in a super-aging society: Adapting the Future Elderly Model to Japan

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF AGEING
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 42-51

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2016.06.001

关键词

Future Elderly Model; Microsimulation; Aging; Comorbidities; Long-term Care; Japan

资金

  1. Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Japan Fund
  2. Stanford Center on the Demography and Economics of Health and Aging
  3. National Institute on Aging [AG017253, P30 AG017253, R37AG036791, P01AG05842]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Japan has experienced pronounced population aging, and now has the highest proportion of elderly adults in the world. Yet few projections of Japan's future demography go beyond estimating population by age and sex to forecast the complex evolution of the health and functioning of the future elderly. This study estimates a new state-transition microsimulation model - the Japanese Future Elderly Model (FEM) - for Japan. We use the model to forecast disability and health for Japan's future elderly. Our simulation suggests that by 2040, over 27 percent of Japan's elderly will exhibit 3 or more limitations in IADLs and social functioning; almost one in 4 will experience difficulties with 3 or more ADLs; and approximately one in 5 will suffer limitations in cognitive or intellectual functioning. Since the majority of the increase in disability arises from the aging of the Japanese population, prevention efforts that reduce age-specific morbidity can help reduce the burden of disability but may have only a limited impact on reducing the overall prevalence of disability among Japanese elderly. While both age and morbidity contribute to a predicted increase in disability burden among elderly Japanese in the future, our simulation results suggest that the impact of population aging exceeds the effect of age-specific morbidity on increasing disability in Japan's future. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据