4.3 Article

Local and Systemic CD4+ T Cell Exhaustion Reverses with Clinical Resolution of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 2017, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2017/3642832

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5T32HL094296, T32HL069765, K01HL103179, U01HL112694-01, R01 HL117074, UL1 RR-024975, U01HL112707]
  2. Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center Grant [P30CA68485]
  3. Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Research Center Grant [DK058404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigation of the Th1 immune response in sarcoidosis CD4(+) T cells has revealed reduced proliferative capacity and cytokine expression upon TCR stimulation. In other disease models, such cellular dysfunction has been associated with a step-wise, progressive loss of T cell function that results from chronic antigenic stimulation. T cell exhaustion is defined by decreased cytokine production upon TCR activation, decreased proliferation, increased expression of inhibitory cell surface receptors, and increased susceptibility to apoptosis. We characterized sarcoidosis CD4(+) T cell immune function in systemic and local environments among subjects undergoing disease progression compared to those experiencing disease resolution. Spontaneous and TCR-stimulated Th1 cytokine expression and proliferation assays were performed in 53 sarcoidosis subjects and 30 healthy controls. PD-1 expression and apoptosis were assessed by flow cytometry. Compared to healthy controls, sarcoidosis CD4(+) T cells demonstrated reductions in Th1 cytokine expression, proliferative capacity (p < 0 05), enhanced apoptosis (p < 0 01), and increased PD-1 expression (p < 0 001). BAL-derived CD4(+) T cells also demonstrated multiple facets of T cell exhaustion (p < 0 05). Reversal of CD4(+) T cell exhaustion was observed in subjects undergoing spontaneous resolution (p < 0 05). Sarcoidosis CD4(+) T cells exhibit loss of cellular function during progressive disease that follows the archetype of T cell exhaustion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据